Microsoft: Open Source Has Cooties

Microsoft claims that open source software in Linux violates 235 Microsoft-held patents. Really, honest, they counted and everything.

[Microsoft's lawyer] says that the Linux kernel – the deepest layer of the free operating system, which interacts most directly with the computer hardware – violates 42 Microsoft patents. The Linux graphical user interfaces – essentially, the way design elements like menus and toolbars are set up – run afoul of another 65, he claims. The Open Office suite of programs, which is analogous to Microsoft Office, infringes 45 more. E-mail programs infringe 15, while other assorted [free and open source] programs allegedly transgress 68.

The risibility of Microsoft accusing “teh Interweb” of, say, violating its intellectual property on user interfaces? Indeed, quite risible.

In 1988, Apple sued Microsoft for copyright infringement of the LISA and Apple Macintosh GUI. The court case lasted 4 years before almost all of Apple’s claims were denied on a contractual technicality. Subsequent appeals by Apple were also denied, and Microsoft and Apple apparently entered a final, private settlement of the matter in 1997 as a side note in a broader announcement of investment and cooperation.

Steve Ballmer claims that Microsoft is being bullied by, um, teh Interweb. No, really.

“We live in a world where we honor, and support the honoring of, intellectual property,” says Ballmer in an interview.

As seen by Microsoft’s history of honoring and supporting intellectual property by purchasing it, putting it in a small box, and then taking it out and playing with it on annual developer days.

Note that it’s a sad day when Fortune’s title for this story is actually funnier than mine:

Microsoft takes on the free world.

  • Toastrider

    Ahahahaha… hahaha… wheee…

    Bless their pea-pickin’ hearts.

    –TR

  • http://www.beafraid.com Hellfire

    Yeah, because no other company goes batshit crazy when they have the LEGAL recourse to do so. The moral right and/or reasonable ethical standards don’t exist for *ANY* of these people. It doesn’t bother me for that very reason – it’s consistent and pervasive.

    Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery, but imitation alone doesn’t pay the bills. How many OSS projects sprang up with “this is a copy of MS xxx” as their only founding principle?

    In a perfect world Microsoft would lead the software industry by example and earn the respect and admiration of all. Far too many software bigots perpetuate the myth that the evil empire is trying to murder their children and rape their pets.

    I’ve always been agnostic in such debates. I use the best product my budget allows for – where it came from is irrelevant. Properly managed, linux and windows can co-exist wonderfully. This just in, managing IT is hard when you’re stupid.

    If Office2007 had come out as the new version of StarOffice, it’d be the universally lauded “best title of the year” in every publication that had such an award.

  • http://www.beafraid.com Hellfire

    … *sigh* lern2proofread on sites without edit buttons.

    :sadface: Lum, :sadface:

  • Aufero

    The SCO case is finally headed down the tubes, so it’s time to take another shot at legal-sounding FUD. Announcing that you’ve found [some random number] of (unspecified) patent infringements costs no money, and who knows, it might scare a few businesses into coughing up for Vista or a Novell license.

  • http://www.plutospage.com/wow/ yunk

    If I were drinking milk it would be all over the screen.

    This reminds me of when Unisys lawyers said they had a patent on hyperlinks.

  • nerd gone bad

    You could cut the irony and hypocrisy with a dull mouse cursor it’s so palpable. Thanks for providing a perfect example scott.

    This as a FUD campaing serves M$ interest by sowing seeds of doubt in jane/joe user who might become curious about linux or anything else besides M$, whether they take it to court or not.

    I guess the numerous countries and developing nation’s governments and educational systems announcing they’re dumping M$ for open source has got them a little worried? So they’re lashing out with a multi-pronged strategy of offering free product, FUD campaigns, and patent threats in a desperate attempt to keep their bot-network and cash-flow systems hooked into their udders.

    Ballmer talking of honour on behalf of myopic mega-corps who’ve never heard of the word (or ethics or the environment for that matter) is rich. Free Marketing in a neoliberlist society – LOL. They should win the market by innovative quality products, not unethical patent mongering.

  • Factory

    Hmm the thing that gets me is the short memory of the computer industry. Back in the eighties Gates wasn’t famous for being the richest man in the world. His main claim to fame was his habit of sitting up the front of competitors product previews with a notepad and pen, scribbling down every new feature the product had. Strangely enough when the rival MS product was previewed it had a feature list that was stunningly similar to the non-MS software.
    (Of course not all of those features actually made it into the shipped product)