RealID: Worst Case Scenario

I fully expect this blog to disappear today. In fact I hope it does. I am tempted to file an abuse report on it myself.

Robert “Bobby” Kotick The big man at Activision. CEO. The source of all Blizzard’s community problems of the last few years. Here’s his facebook: http://www.facebook.com/people/Bobby-Kotick/637011873 He’s not very open, but his friends and family are.

Big donations to the GOP ($28,000 in 2007, and raised over $200k for Bush!) but makes $1.5 million a year and just dumped a huge amount of his company’s stock at the beginning of this year. You know, I’d be selling my Blizzard stock right now too.

But hey, he’s a busy man. He’s got a wife and three young daughters, ages 6, 9, and 11. The oldest is Gracie, she likes skiing. There are pictures of her that can be found, but I’m not posting them because I think I’ve made my point there.

Here’s some information on his wife.

  • Hank

    It bums me out that someone decided to be a shithead over this.

  • Luckton

    *continues munching on popcorn*
    Truly, Bliz is bringing the ‘Cataclysm’ to their games…I say launch the thing already and let the pieces fall where they may.  It’ll either break Activision and Bliz, or bring forth the revolution that the internet needs in order to bring it to the next level…where anonymity is referred to as ‘noobing it’.

  • Elovia

    Once the genie is out of the bottle, there’s no putting it back.

    Does that blog cause you to worry about catching the eye of some internet whackdoodle, Scott?

  • Wufiavelli

    Interesting way to complain about the realId system.  Think the point is well made though,  as appauling as it might be.

  • FG

    While I applaud the attempt at trying to thwart John Gabriel’s Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory, I have two observations
     
    1) Blizzard should have been able to easily predict the backlash
    2) My experiences on the internet have shown that even if you are not anonymous, people are still fuckwads on the internet. My town has a internet forum where people are forced to use their real names (and also has its own directory so you can easily see where people live). It does not curtail people from being fuckwads.

  • http://geldonsgaming.blogspot.com geldonyetich

    Ah, truly a grand old MMORPG meltdown, isn’t it?
     
    I saw it coming that people would stalk specifically to express outrage over Blizzard’s RealID transition, but that’s still something completely different from a transition to RealID enabling stalkers who have motivations other than to be pissy.
     

  • James Jones

    Hank, it’s really hard to know just who you specifically mean with that statement.

  • Susan

    It’s a point that needs to be made.  Right now, if someone piques your interest on the forums, for whatever reason, the most you can do is try to find them in game and harass them.  Once they implement this change, that person can find you in real life and harass you, and anyone associated with you.  I’m not nearly as private as I used to be, but I’m not willing to post on a WoW board with my real name.  My big fear is that they’ll implement this retroactively, or worse, in game.  I have 3 WoW accounts, and I canceled them all because of this.  It’s stupidity at its worst.

  • Flaime

    Why are you tempted? The information is all public. And the guy isn’t threatening or debasing them in any way. He’s posting information. Now, it would have been better to link to all the info, but I don’t have a problem with his blog.

  • JeremyT

    Yeah, what’s the issue here Scott? These people have chosen to make all of this data available. This guy is just aggregating it to demonstrate a point; the information itself is freely available to anybody.
     
    Are you worried that this somehow enables stalkers who don’t know how to use google? Honestly, a guy who is too lazy or stupid to punch somebody’s name into google himself probably lacks the skill and dedication to be a proper stalker anyway.

  • Luckton

    What will be interesting to see is if El Presidente Kotick (viva Presidente!) comes down from his throne on this and says “Ok, maybe this wasn’t such a hot idea…”

  • Arthur_Parker

    The guy is making a perfectly valid point.
    I still think everyone is overreacting to this though, sensible people don’t use their real names on the internet, as I understand it, you won’t be forced to reveal your real name unless you post on their new forums.  So the obvious solution is, don’t post on their new forums.
    The Mythic billing thing was much more deserving of outrage imho.

  • Aufero

    I don’t know about Lum, but I’m tempted to file an abuse report on it just because it reveals names, ages, hobbies and contact info for children.  Yes, that’s easily available public information – it’s still irresponsible to list it all where some idiot who has barely enough brains to make a threatening phone call can use it.
    It makes the problem with the RealID program and real names on the internet plain, though.

  • Luckton

    Another thought: Maybe this is some ingenious plot to make people aware of just how much of their information is ‘public’, and how they should either a)Take better care of it or b)Get with their lawmakers about changing what’s revealed and what is not.

  • Brask Mumei

    For the very reason you are tempted to file an abuse report is exactly why the blog should remain.
     
    This info is already there.  The author didn’t fly to Bobby’s house and spy on his local grade schools to learn the names.
     
    True Names are to be used with caution on the internet precisely because we don’t want it to be so easy to collate and cross reference everything about ourselves.  Blizzard is forcing True Names in a rather blatant attempt to cash in on the “Social Networking” fad.  Reducing trolling is a smoke screen.  When they say they thought long and hard about this, they mean they thought long and hard about how to get to their end goal: all your info belongs to them.
     
    Right now Blizzard can’t effectively monetize all their billing data due to pesky ToS and privacy policies they foolishly agreed to.  So they thought long and hard about how to eliminate those requirements.  They went for a boiling frogs approach.  This RealId is part of a staged assault, and this is just the latest foray.  Which is why the players are up in arms.
     
    Of course, the higher ups no doubt have already predicted a “small number of losses” and, as a result, it does not matter in the least the number of rage quits there are.  I am rather curious, however, at what the % increase in daily cancels there is, or isn’t.  And I’m also curious if there is a number that would trigger the executives to rethink.  I doubt the latter.  I’ve watched enough boneheaded decisions being wedged through corporations despite massive internal complaints, then despite massive external complaints, and then despite massive market losses.  Those losses are then blamed on “market conditions” or “9/11″ or some equally external scapegoat.
     
    As Sanya points out, active forum users are a minority.  Most players won’t find out about this for a few months until they are sent to the forum for a tech support issue and go “WTF do I have to give a real name?”  So this will go through.  The forums will stay trolly.  They’ll probably not even go that quiet, as enough people won’t care.  Then in a few months, the next phase will be rolled out.

  • http://www.facebook.com/mwisconsin Thomas Valley

    True Names are to be used with caution
    Somewhere, possibly back in the 80s, Vernor Vinge says: “I told you so.”

  • http://www.killtenrats.com Julian

    The blog should remain, but I wish it had been directed to Activision and not Blizzard. I’ll venture a wild guess and say that most Blizzard folks aren’t too thrilled about this whole Real ID thing either and would rather it didn’t exist.
    The suits at Activision are another story, though. Still the blog proves the point, as disgusting as it might be.

  • john smith

    I’d rather nobody ever got hurt over this, but realistically speaking: those in power will never give up their power or change their “wicked” ways until something happens to them and theirs. You can see this throughout history with the rise and fall of European monarchies. Things start out peachy, then over time get worse and worse until you have some extremely ambitious guy like Mr. Kotick is in charge, telling the starving peasants to eat cake. Or in this case, just not play any games from the biggest game company ever or post on their forums if you don’t want to give up all your rights!
    My true fear is not that some wackjob will harasse that poor millionaires working at Blizzard/Acctivision, but that this company IS big enough to get away with this clear violation of our rights. They have essentially reached 19th century Oil Barron status and think they can do no wrong. This simply can not end well for either party.
    “Are you worried that this somehow enables stalkers who don’t know how to use google?”
    It does. It’s just like people who are extremely depressed and want to kill themselves, but are so depressed  they don’t have the motivation to do so. However, once they start taking their medication and start feeling “better”, they now have the motivation to go through with their self destructive plans. Lots of people are angry over this, and rightfully so, but few of them have the motivation to act on this. Now they do, all the leg work is done for them. And those sickos who like to harass/murder/rape/whatever now have an additional motivation: People might cheer for them and treat them as heros if they go after these specific people.
    I don’t want to sound melodramatic but these are dangerous times. Both sides of this particular argument have so much to potentially lose, and both sides do have the money, time and power to enforce their will. While that blog does make an excellent point, it opens doors that are very hard to close.

  • http://geldonsgaming.blogspot.com geldonyetich

    There’s two ways to approach trolls under bridges.  You can slay them or pretend they don’t exist, ignoring that they come out to take a toll every once in awhile.

  • blastomite

    Sure its creepy but you gotta realize, and I speak from personal experience. There are ALOT of people that already RL stalk folks through WOW. As a officer of a guild with a long standing “No jerk” policy you get ALOT of people pissed off. ALOT ALOT…  like so many you wouldnt believe. App denied for calling people fag, App denied for trash talking in trade chat. Kicked from guild for trash talking / flying off the handle.
    So ya.. the GM and several officers get regular stalker hang up calls and nasty voice mails.. and have for years. So their only option is to fully remove themselves from this real id business as much as possible. Which means that the community active end game guild figure heads will no longer be participating in the community. For fear of even MORE RL harrassment.
    Fun times ahead!

  • Aufero

    <blockquote cite=”comment-42947″><strong><a href=”#comment-42947″>Arthur_Parker</a></strong>:I still think everyone is overreacting to this though, sensible people don’t use their real names on the internet</blockquote>

    Blizzard seems to be counting on a sizable fraction of their users not being sensible.  After all, the assumption behind the Real ID program (and its upcoming Facebook tie-in) is that people will want to use their real names on the internet.  Social networking is the wave of the future!  Surely you have nothing to hide, do you?

  • Aufero

    WordPress tag fail.

  • James Jones

    I hope that blog keeps going.  It’s an interesting preview of what the typical inter-guild conflict in WoW will look like once Cataclysm goes live.

  • http://beafraid.com hellfire

    Hank: It bums me out that someone decided to be a shithead over this.

    It bums me out that Blizzard is too careless, too clueless, too ambivalent or straight up evil to not foresee this exact issue and do everything in their power to make sure it was in no way, shape or form possible.

    Aufero: I don’t know about Lum, but I’m tempted to file an abuse report on it just because it reveals names, ages, hobbies and contact info for children. Yes, that’s easily available public information – it’s still irresponsible to list it all where some idiot who has barely enough brains to make a threatening phone call can use it. It makes the problem with the RealID program and real names on the internet plain, though.

    The proposed implementation of RealID is irresponsible. Watching someone tally up the “online life” of an average person should scare the living shit out of every single one of us. But hey, by all means let’s wait for the first casualty before we care. I’m sure that will make the victims family feel much better. How many minors play WoW? How many have well-intentioned parents who vetted the game for content and regulate the amount of time allowed in-game have any idea that very, very soon their name (or their child’s name) will be attached to the forums and whatever else Blizzard wants after that’s done?

    For the hundredth time: How is this even legal?

  • http://ardwulfslair.wordpress.com Ardwulf

    At first, I wasn’t sure whether to applaud or shake my fist in outrage.
     
    But after actually checking out the link, I think I’ll err on the side of outrage.  This guy’s digging up stuff on Kotick, who has the money to pay bodyguards and security and such, but also on random people who work for Blizzard, who may or may not have had anything to do with RealID.  That’s dirty playing, even if done to make a point.

  • James Jones

    “That’s dirty playing, even if done to make a point.”
    Perhaps, but it’s exactly the sort of thing that will be happening to the players once this new system goes live.  How is it okay for this to happen to the players but not the employees of the company?  Why the double-standard?

  • Ashendarei

    you know, my old man had a phrase: “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander”

    to paraphrase for anyone who hasn’t heard that one before Life is a two way street, I hope the blog continues and builds till there is enough internal pressure to force them to back off from their plans to abuse their own playerbase’s personal information for profit.

  • Elovia

    “…to back off from their plans to abuse their own playerbase’s personal information for profit.”

    More ironic would be if the blogger started charging a finders fee to viewers for information found freely on the internet.

  • JohnG228

    Part of me understands this reaction, but that doesn’t change the fact that it is just plain wrong.  I could care less about Greg Camessa or Bobby K.  They have both brought this on themselves by the things they have done.  But the family members and the other employees have done nothing but their jobs.  This is really wrong.

  • John Smith

    It’s not fair to their family and friends but, those people “just doing their job” should had thought about that before they put everyone elses’s family and friends at risk in the same way. I think that’s one of the points that the blogger is trying to make. It’s not just “your” name that is being made public here. With just someone’s name you put a lot of  other unrelated people at risk who weren’t to begin with.

  • Buur

    Even if the blog gets taken down, it’s too late. The info is out there and blogs like that will continue to pop up reposting the info and new info until Blizzard/Activision gets the point.

  • ashendarei

    JohnG228:
    Part of me understands this reaction, but that doesn’t change the fact that it is just plain wrong.  I could care less about Greg Camessa or Bobby K.  They have both brought this on themselves by the things they have done.  But the family members and the other employees have done nothing but their jobs.  This is really wrong.

     

    you know, I do feel bad for the blizzard employees who are having their privacy stripped away, but the blog in and of itself has done nothing illegal. We both agree that it’s a shitty thing to do, and we can hash out the morality of it later, but when it comes down to it this is a small-scale version of what can easily happen to people who don’t know any better and don’t know how to protect themselves from it.

    In this case I would personally have gone after the activision directors and top staff, rather then the rank-and-file employees, but as far as proving his point it does do an admirable job.

  • Sinij

    I hope Kotick get stalked by WoW weirdo (or couple hundred) so he can realize that selling user’s privacy to a highest bidder is not a good way to make more money.

  • Zuzax

    This blog entry appears to be an unexpected “Friends and Family” Alpha test of what Blizzard plans to do with RealID.  I think it’s great that Activision/Blizzard gets to experience first hand what a portion of their customer base will inevitably go through once they implement RealID.
    How could they possibly object to being subjected to such an outcome?  I guess they didn’t factor this into their risk/reward calculations.

  • Rob

    … and a theme song for the nice man behind the blog: http://thesongoftheday.com/index.cgi?_w=1&_d=012609

  • http://stabbedup.blogspot.com/ Stabs

    Regarding the disclosure of information about children it should be noted that many of Blizzard’s customers also have children and it’s not just going to be players who are at risk should Mr Gamer Rage decide to come visit but their families too.
    Many of us purchased WoW and expansions year ago when none of this was reasonably foreseeable. Introducing it this late to a game people have been enjoying for years is just not acceptable.
    This makes WoW unplayable for many of us. I can’t be chilling online, telling some random dork to die in a fire if I have to worry about their mum phoning my manager in the morning or worse.
    The very fact that this site is both offensive and creepy shows how it is not ok to expose players’ names which would allow the rest of these details to be collected. The high emotions people experience in game coupled with the power of the internet to harass is an absolutely lethal cocktail.

  • Female Gamer

    Not long ago on WoW, someone was having a meltdown in trade chat … something that seems to happen on a weekly basis on that particular server. He’d been kicked from a guild for being, well, the kind of person who would behave like he was behaving at that moment. Among the things he spewed were threats to hunt down the guild officer who gkicked him and rape his little daughter. He was probably just what he looked like, a teenager with social issues having a meltdown. But … well, let’s say he knew from RealID that the officer’s name was Joshua Walker (a name I just picked out of thin air, absolutely no significance at all), and he was from my home state. There’s only one guy in the white pages by that name (he lives about 20 miles from me). Would you sleep as comfortably at night if some creep was threatening to kill you and rape your little girl … and knows exactly where you live, complete with a handy map and driving directions?
     
    Will he carry out those threats? Almost certainly not. If you’re the father of a cute little girl whom you love more than life itself, would you want to risk it?
     
    This is not going to end well.

  • TJ

    This is chilling, and also an example of just what to expect when this goes live. I can’t believe how naive Activision is on this matter, they only see the $$ I guess. I can just see the executives sitting down figuring in dollar amounts how they would still come out ahead even if they lost a few wrongful death lawsuits..putting a dollar amount on what a human life is worth and weighing it against their potential profits…it’s nauseating.

  • Aaron

    Maybe when all these guys go home and have spouses sending them packing they’ll realize that they made a bit of a mistake.

  • http://www.whatwouldmattdo.com Matt

    Yeah, that site is horrible. But…that information is already available. People are plain freaking out here…thinking they are anonymous at this point. They aren’t. You aren’t. We aren’t. This going to make it easier to track down someone for sure, but for any determined stalker, that was already pretty easy.

    You haven’t been anonymous up to this point, this is just Blizzard making you aware.

  • Avecrien

    The runner of that site is making a valid point and making it no easier to harm others than Blizz is. His restraint in the face of what we’re being threatened with is admirable. Wanting to report him should mean that you’re up in arms over the people who will be harmed by people using the tools Blizz is giving them to find their victims.

    Calling the system optional while calling yourself a gamer seems pretty inconsistent. We should be aware of the mandatory optional things present in games like WoW. Addons for raiders being an example. We also know that Blizzard’s optional features along these lines have crept into being mandatory in the past.

    It’ll be interesting if this stuff passes, not just for the nerd rage done to physical bodies and real identities, but for when people’s accounts get hijacked and the thief gets to parade around with their victim’s face on. Just think of all the things people will be able to do by abusing this.

  • http://www.eldergame.com srand

    I can just imagine: anonymous blogs that compile public personal information for your realm’s “well-known” loot ninjas! And Auction House undercutters! Won’t that be fun?

  • James Jones

    “This going to make it easier to track down someone for sure, but for any determined stalker, that was already pretty easy.”
    Sure, any determined stalker can already find you without your real name as a starting point.  But determination isn’t an all-or-nothing measurement.  Is it probable that some not-quite-as-determined stalker that wouldn’t have bothered without the name given to them will go ahead and move forward with nefarious deeds if the name is readily available?
    I think some will.  If you don’t think so then I can understand your not thinking this is a big deal.

  • Ben W

    For those who are thinking this is all Activision’s doing… keep in mind that this is hardly the first time Blizzard has been caught trying to futz with their users’ personal information. There was a class action lawsuit back in 1998 filed against Blizzard because of their games gathering personal user information and sending it back to Blizzard, and another suit fairly recently about the Warden storing information it shouldn’t have been privy to. Blizzard’s been messing with personal information for years.

  • Tox

    Real ID would be fine if either a) everyone had no privacy or b) everyone had privacy. Honestly, what should be shut down is the public records trade. It should be illegal to buy and sell public records. I don’t know why the government has not clamped down on that activity yet, especially considering that it is a national security issue.

  • http://www.poesies.com Cedia

    What’s really hilarious is getting a ban warning from posting that link on a site who is arguing that the problem is all in our heads because it’s “optional”.
    Magic 8 ball says bad things to come because the typical WoW player will ostrich themselves the same way.

  • dartwick

    This is kind of like the 2 methods you can use to get a game dev to fix an exploit.
    You can email them and ask them to fix it. They will address it when they have spare time.
     
    Or you can list the exploit on every forum you know of they then the game dev fixes the exploit that day.
     
    A lot of people complain about approach number 2 but it gets better results.
     

  • Brask Mumei

    Privacy is, and always has been, an illusion.
     
    Privacy is different from secrecy.  Privacy is when we agree not to look.
     
    This is why the consolidation of otherwise available information strikes us as an invasion of privacy.  This is why we like to put a “face” on some of our activities, even if such a facade could be pierced by a determined attacker.  The benefit is that those of us that don’t want to be determined attackers don’t accidentally pierce the facade.
     
    If I’m playing cards with someone, we could play with all the hands open on the table and just agree not to look.  But this is troublesome and annoying, so the convention is to hold them so they can’t be seen.  When someone fails to hold them properly, good form is to tell them to hide their cards better, not to peek and try to gain advantage.
     
    Blizzards actions are to demand everyone show their cards.  Since the game being played is one in which the players specifically want to *escape* the real world, this means we are all obligated to shield our eyes and pretend not to see the John Smiths and so forth.  This is possible, but is annoying.  It is like looking through resumes – I consciously try to skip over the name so as to minimize any prejudices I might bring to the table.  I don’t want my first bit of info to be the name – I want it to be their experience.

  • Hank

    @james & Hellfire
    So RealID makes it OK to go about and publish other people’s information?  Instead of showing tact, ethics and restraint, the person who posted that chose to behave like a child.  That blog makes Blizzard’s case for RealID far better than anything they could have done internally.  The fact that it goes as far as it does and then is posted from an anonymous account is just icing on the cake.  I don’t like the concept much but I also don’t like to see people go to extremes for no real reason other than to be an asshole.   That blog accomplishes much less than a Letter or a phone call in changing what Blizzard will do.
    Whatever you do about RealID, (and that is up to you, personally,) is your decision.  If you don’t like the policy, leave or circumvent it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/acbeckers Alex Beckers

    I guess I shouldn’t be surprised by the number of people who are freaking out over a misinterpretation of Real ID, but it does need to be repeated: If you don’t post on the official forums, and don’t give your battle.net email address to anyone, no one will know your real name.
    What % of the player base do we think fall into both categories?