<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Broken Toys &#187; Living In Oz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brokentoys.org/category/living-in-oz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brokentoys.org</link>
	<description>Random Comments About Gaming And Tractors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Australia To Protect Us All From Us All</title>
		<link>http://www.brokentoys.org/2009/06/25/australia-to-protect-us-all-from-us-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brokentoys.org/2009/06/25/australia-to-protect-us-all-from-us-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Living In Oz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brokentoys.org/2009/06/25/australia-to-protect-us-all-from-us-all/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Tateru Nino on Massively, Australia is set to filter out online gaming that their government disapproves of at the network level. While Senator Conroy refers to &#8216;games&#8217;, this appears to just be the spoonful of sugar to make &#8230; <a href="http://www.brokentoys.org/2009/06/25/australia-to-protect-us-all-from-us-all/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.massively.com/2009/06/25/australian-network-filtering-promises-to-reach-out-to-block-game/">Tateru Nino on Massively</a>, <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/games/web-filters-to-censor-video-games-20090625-cxrx.html">Australia is set to filter out online gaming that their government disapproves of at the network level.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
  While Senator Conroy refers to &#8216;games&#8217;, this appears to just be the spoonful of sugar to make it easier to swallow. Does anyone think that virtual environments like <em>Second Life</em> will be exempt from the proposed network-blocking? We don&#8217;t. Some sources are reporting that environments like <em>Second Life</em> and games like <em>Age of Conan</em> or <em>World of Warcraft</em> are confirmed as being banned outright, but at this stage, nobody official has actually said that.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Except that, well, they have, in so many words.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Senator Conroy&#8217;s spokesman said the filter would cover &#8220;computer games such as web-based flash games and downloadable games, if a complaint is received and the content is determined by ACMA to be Refused Classification&#8221;. All games that exceed MA15+ are deemed to be RC.</p>
<p>The filtering could also block &#8220;the importation of physical copies of computer games sold over the internet which have been classified RC&#8221;, the spokesman said.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Note that MMOs are by their very user-generated nature (no one can really stop you from saying improper things on an online game, as anyone knows who&#8217;s played one for more than 40 seconds) difficult to submit for content rating. In the US, initially, games such as Ultima Online were rated &#8220;M&#8221; for Mature due to this; eventually a compromise was found where the game content supplied by the manufacturer was rated (almost always &#8220;T&#8221; for Teen) and a &#8220;Content may change in online play&#8221; qualifier clearly added. However, the rating system in Australia is different; among other problems they don&#8217;t even *have* an &#8220;M&#8221; rating; things that would be rated &#8220;M&#8221; just don&#8217;t get sold.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Mark Newton, an ISP engineer and internet filtering critic, said the move to extend the filtering to computer games would place a cloud over online-only games such as World of Warcraft and Second Life, which aren&#8217;t classified in Australia due to their online nature.</p>
<p>He said the online distribution of such games has historically been exempt from customs controls on RC material because they have only ever covered physical articles.</p>
<p>&#8220;That exemption is the only reason why multi-player games with user-generated environments are possible in this country; without it, it&#8217;d only take one game user anywhere in the world to produce objectionable content in the game environment to make the Australian Government ban the game for everyone,&#8221; said Newton.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s good to see the Pacific Rim working together on how to be <a href="http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13917484">mindlessly paternalistic</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brokentoys.org/2009/06/25/australia-to-protect-us-all-from-us-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

