<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Broken Toys &#187; Noblegarden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brokentoys.org/category/noblegarden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brokentoys.org</link>
	<description>Random Comments About Gaming And Tractors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When You Put Bunny Ears On An Orc, YOU PROMOTE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN</title>
		<link>http://www.brokentoys.org/2009/04/29/when-you-put-bunny-ears-on-an-orc-you-promote-violence-against-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brokentoys.org/2009/04/29/when-you-put-bunny-ears-on-an-orc-you-promote-violence-against-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Noblegarden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WoW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brokentoys.org/?p=3736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feministing dislikes Noblegarden. (I do too, but only because it&#8217;s really tedious.) To be a bit more serious, they do have a valid point, and one that could have been minimized very easily with intelligent design (for example, requiring both &#8230; <a href="http://www.brokentoys.org/2009/04/29/when-you-put-bunny-ears-on-an-orc-you-promote-violence-against-women/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://community.feministing.com/2009/04/wow-thats-boring-lets-add-sexi.html">Feministing dislikes Noblegarden.</a></p>
<p>(I do too, but only because it&#8217;s really tedious.)</p>
<p>To be a bit more serious, they do have a valid point, and one that could have been minimized very easily with intelligent design (for example, requiring both players to trade an item to activate the bunny state). But Blizzard has shown time and again that not only do they tend to encourage their community to <a href="http://www.wowinsider.com/2007/03/01/is-the-armory-site-an-invasion-of-privacy/">minimize social concerns</a>, they also tend to <a href="http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/items/tinfoilhat.xml">respond childishly</a> when those concerns are brought up.</p>
<p>And yet, hey, 12 million subscribers!</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.wowinsider.com/2009/04/29/player-receives-developer-item-in-the-mail-one-shots-ulduar/">One of whom apparently won the game. Whoops.</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brokentoys.org/2009/04/29/when-you-put-bunny-ears-on-an-orc-you-promote-violence-against-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

